TECHNICAL FILE · GAP REVIEW

Technical File Review and Evidence Gap Assessment

We test the dossier from device definition through supporting evidence and distinguish missing documents, insufficient evidence, and cross-section inconsistency.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Who is this service for?

  • Manufacturers building a new dossier
  • Teams seeking an independent review of an existing file
  • Products needing change-impact review across evidence
INPUTS

What the review needs

  • Device description and variants
  • Dossier index and documents
  • Risk management and verification reports
  • Labelling and instructions for use
OUTPUTS

Reviewable deliverables

Dossier map

Fix the device baseline

Prioritized gap register

Check structural completeness

Traceability matrix

Trace claims and risks to evidence

Finding-closure criteria

Deliver an actionable closure register

Technical documentation and product compliance

Rebuilding evidence traceability for a generic therapeutic-device dossier

A work case on connecting risks, design requirements, verification, and labelling in a therapeutic-device dossier.

Read the work case
DIRECT ANSWERS

Before engagement

Is a table of contents sufficient?

No. Organization does not prove evidence sufficiency, consistency, or traceability.

Does review include writing every document?

That is agreed separately after review; the default scope is assessment and gap definition.

SOURCES

Official references

Sources describe the general framework. Current versions and case-specific requirements must be checked before a regulatory or commercial decision.

NEXT STEP

Request a dossier-readiness review

Sources describe the general framework. Current versions and case-specific requirements must be checked before a regulatory or commercial decision.